Files
Tanish MankuandClaude d9607ec3be F3: one documented substitution chain, and report what it chose and why
A font the document does not embed was replaced by whatever the caller
happened to pick, and nothing told the user. `doc_info` said only
`embedded: false`, which is why "my Chinese PDF shows nothing" has been
a mystery rather than a sentence.

`crates/fonts/src/fallback.rs` applies one chain, in a documented order,
and returns what it chose with a reason:

1. embedded -> nothing substituted;
2. /BaseFont names a standard-14 face or a known alias (exact metrics);
3. craft-fonts holds that exact family;
4. /CIDSystemInfo /Ordering names a script we have a face for;
5. the ordering names a script we have no licensed face for -- report
   none, so nothing is drawn rather than the wrong glyphs;
6. otherwise the nearest of the fourteen by descriptor flags.

It delegates to the existing per-script selectors instead of restating
their order, so each keeps one source of truth. It answers the
dictionary question only; "which face has a glyph for this character?"
depends on the string being drawn and stays where the drawing happens.

`doc_info` gains `substitute` and `substitution` per font. Both null
means the document's own glyphs are shown; a null `substitute` with a
reason means no face was available at all. That is Acrobat's Actual
Font, minus the interface, which `parity/` now records as still missing.

Two findings on the way:

`Std14::from_base_font` matches loosely, so "SomeHouseSerif" resolved to
Times by its name containing "serif". The face is a fair guess but
reporting it as "names one of the standard 14" would have been untrue of
a font nobody has heard of. `Std14::recognise` now says whether a name
matched an alias or only a family hint, and the two report differently.
`from_base_font` is unchanged.

The generated table moved to `crates/fonts/src/std14_metrics.rs`, data
alone, and the ATTRIBUTION entry and AGENTS.md 1.1 line follow it. F1
put the hash on a file holding both the table and the code reading it,
so this commit's ordinary edits tripped the gate -- and a hash that
churns on unrelated changes gets re-attested reflexively, which is the
protection gone. Verified both directions after the split: editing
std14.rs passes the gate, changing one width in std14_metrics.rs fails
it.

Every new test was watched failing first: removing the script step
breaks the two unit tests and the doc_info integration test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
2026-10-13 16:42:10 -07:00
..
2026-09-30 11:00:02 -04:00